The History of Freddie Mercury by MV Ahundova

Page 13

Rick Sky deliberately slandered Mercury, writing his vile lampoon, a fake full of filth, hatred and vile speculations and issued for "testimony"! And I would not be surprised if it turns out that Rick Sky did not see any Freddie Mercury in the eye and never interviewed him, and all his "recollections of meetings" were born in the quiet of the office at the request of high-ranking persons.

He and as a journalist are no good. It's amazing how the employers of Rick Skaya could entrust him with such a responsible job - publicly disgracing the idol of millions! After all, he is such an amateur - with one careless phrase he completely gave himself away:

"Why Mercury never admitted that he was a homosexual, laughed and left the answer - we'll never know. Some believe that he did not want to offend his deeply religious parents. Others believe that being secretive, he never dedicated anyone to the details of his life. Still others believed that, as a true businessman, Freddie decided not to publicize his passions, as it can reject some of his fans ... ".

That's always the case, when people lie all the time - they will definitely say something that will completely give them out. Rick Sky already lied when he said that Mercury "joked and left the answer." He did not "joke" - these nasty questions made him furious. He objected sharply when he heard this (see the video of the movie "Champions Of The World" - you can see how Freddie's cheekbones go from rage and there are tears in his eyes). But this is not the main thing.

Rick Sky actually admitted that Mercury never "confessed" to homosexuality. Where did all these interviews come from, in which he talked about his homosexual adventures? When, where and to whom did he "confess to bisexuality" ?!

Rick Sky says that Mercury was a secretive person, and it's true: for all Freddie's sociability, his really close friends could be counted on the fingers - his innate Parsi secrecy affected. He himself said: "Only a few people know what I am." Where did all these crowds of "close friends" who lined up turn to tell about Freddie's gay adventures and lovers - if he "never dedicated anyone to the details of his life" ?! How do they all know this ?! Who is this at all ?!

Not me - the official story of "Queen" reports that Freddie avoided talking about his personal life and in his interviews spoke only about creativity. Only a couple of times he said a few words about his personal - but there was nothing scandalous about them. Where did Rick Skye take his "exclusive", mostly published only after Mercury's death ?!

Thus, Rick Sky openly admitted the fact of falsification of the biography and interviews of Mercury and the deception of readers.

By the way, until the death of Mercury rumors of his homosexuality and remained rumors, newspaper gossip - this is how they perceived ordinary people and most fans. No evidence and compromising evidence was found - books and articles about "Queen", released during the lifetime of Mercury, confirm this. The so-called "circumstances of Mercury's personal life" became known only after Freddie's death from AIDS. Then he was solemnly proclaimed gay - this was considered sufficient evidence. Under the pressure of propaganda, people believed, and dozens of gay inventions poured into the book market.

But if you believe biographers, it turns out that Freddie almost publicly copulated with men, went everywhere with his lovers, and everyone knew about his sexual orientation. And then they say that Freddie was a secretive and self-contained person and did not allow anyone to enter his private life!

Rick Skye - nothing more than a brave hooligan, which is a lot in rock journalism. But in all biographies and articles of Mercury, to some extent, the same is written. The same replication is woven and substituting facts for speculation, the same vulgarity and scandal, the same scrutiny of dirty laundry, the same unsubstantiated lie.

In fact, most books about Freddie Mercury can not even be called biographies - they belong to a different literary genre. This genre is called lampoon, a pamphlet is the story of a famous person, told in a scandalous, discrediting tone by the order of ill-wishers. But pamphlets usually coexist with more objective sources, the more stupid to use a pamphlet as a source of information about a person. But in the case of Freddie Mercury, all his researchers either write pamphlets themselves, or use scandal literature as sources. Because the goal they have is very far from studying the personality and creativity of Freddie Mercury.

But they not only can not prove anything - they are still not able to decide who to still consider Mercury as gay or bisexual. Even if you believe all the rumors about Freddie, then even he can be considered only bisexual, but not homosexual - given that he had girls, he wrote tender love ballads, reacted very vividly to women, changing in their presence. But propaganda persistently calls him gay ... but not only. He is constantly called then gay, then bisexual, and often the same people do it. So, Rick Sky throughout his book calls Mercury gay, repeating this word at least ten times a page. According to Paul Prenter, he says that Freddie "it was easier to walk on the water than lie with a woman." But then he quotes the words of Freddie himself, allegedly that he had "more lovers, men and women, Than Elizabeth Taylor! " After dedicating his book to the stories about the vicious gay Freddie, in the beginning he writes: "Compared to the life that this bisexual singer led" ... It seems he does not remember his own text! Galin, constantly calling Freddie gay, after a few pages, calls him bisexual. But the British press went further than the others in the first days after Freddie's death. In the Daily Express, after a long story about the homosexual Mercury without any transition, they started talking about his "bisexuality", and in the "Independent" he was called both "gay star" and "bisexual star" ... But the British press went further than the others in the first days after Freddie's death. In the Daily Express, after a long story about the homosexual Mercury without any transition, they started talking about his "bisexuality", and in the "Independent" he was called both "gay star" and "bisexual star" ... But the British press went further than the others in the first days after Freddie's death. In the Daily Express, after a long story about the homosexual Mercury without any transition, they started talking about his "bisexuality", and in the "Independent" he was called both "gay star" and "bisexual star" ...

As true falsifiers, they constantly contradict each other and get confused in their own texts, trying to "pull the ears" of information about Freddie as the descent of hell.

As soon as the question arises, why the active gay Mercury spent most of his life with women, they say that Freddie changed his sexual orientation only after thirty years or explain it with bisexuality. Immediately they report that the taste for same-sex love, he bought in the boarding school, with the boys he lived since childhood and in general he was sick of women. But it is necessary to ask a counter question about Mary Austin, with whom Freddie lived for seven years, again begins about the late change of orientation and about bisexuality.

Sometimes, referring to some "friends" and gossip, they say that Freddie was aware of himself as gay in his youth - but he lived with women. He adored women - but could do nothing with his homosexuality. Maybe even had a relationship with women - but only slept with men. Wrote wonderful songs about love, passionately played in shooting with women - he is still gay. All his life he loved Mary Austin - but he lived with her to hide his homosexuality from friends. Why he was embarrassed by this, while he was a simple guy, and stopped shy, becoming a public figure - due to all the same extravagance and the final choice of sexual orientation.

Ask why Freddie never confessed to homosexuality - they will tell about his secrecy and unwillingness to let outsiders into his life. But if you ask why he always appeared in public institutions for gays and right before the eyes of an honest audience he shot peasants there - they talk about "extravagance". And to the question of why there is not a single photo of Freddie made in a gay club, and why "scandalous circumstances" were discovered only after his death - they start the old barrel organ about stealth. This does not prevent from saying that Freddie never concealed his orientation, spoke and behaved like a gay, that everyone knew about it. In doing so, we learn that Freddie was cautious and his sexual orientation was not conspicuous.

13