A journal I guess

Declassified Archives: P-series

        Appendix A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 (contains datasets and forms which are CLASSIFIED.)

        Appendix B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10

i

List of Tables

1.             Listing of Targets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

2.             Series 1-PX100 - 1-PK300 . . . . . . . . . . 

3.             Principal Elements Contained In Designations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

*This section is not viewable, as it is classified, therefore it will not be included. 

ii

Abstract

I have developed a prototype system for cognitive related tasks conducted against targets. The system uses individual 1-Ps' performance histories in conjunction with current data to prioritize a set of possible cognitive abilities, and ultimately, tasks. 

iii

I   Introduction

The assessment of P-series' cognitive and

behavioral capabilities first began in 2007 at C005*. Improving the cognitive capacity of 1-Ps has been a continuous challenge. In order to evaluate the possible sets of tasks, two basic questions must be addressed: 

  (1)     What constitutes the target? 

  (2)     What constitutes the response? 

In research-oriented tasks, the targets are clearly and objectively defined and easy to follow; unlike application-oriented tasks which have certain levels of unpredictability and are not defined objectively. In the first mentioned task domain, 1-Ps responses consist of sketches or incoherent phrases. Decoding these "natural" responses has been an unsolved problem, and therefore a complete definition of a 1-P response is problematical.

In application-oriented tasks, however, the 1-P series shows promise. Responses are composed of a spectrum; and so an average was used in the dataset. Responses commonly consist of aggression and other forms of reactive behavior. This can be utilised to determine the level of cognitive dissonance.