Part 5

6 1 0
                                        

Our office chat, fondly nicknamed "The Sofa", is a world of its own, governed by its own peculiar rules. Real names are a rarity here. Instead, colleagues prefer aliases—code names or even numbers that correspond to their current projects. For example, someone might be known as "Eagle42" or "Protocol88", and those are among the more straightforward choices. Occasionally, a message pops up from "7(6711)" or "0<R!12", leaving you utterly baffled about which department they belong to or who's behind the cryptic moniker.

This constant anonymity leads to some hilarious misunderstandings. Once, I posed a technical question and received a seemingly nonsensical reply, which turned out to be a joke from one of the analysts. I only realised much later that it was "Code42"—our resident prankster, Jamil, the sysadmin. Up until then, I'd assumed he was someone from support.

The entire chat feels like a never-ending puzzle. It's almost a game, where you never truly know who you're speaking to until you dig deeper. For more clarity—and less banter—you can always switch to a private channel for one-on-one conversations. This is especially helpful when trying to determine who's responsible for what task, given that our company has 180 employees spread across four departments.

At times, the chat resembles a secret society. There's an undeniable charm to it: you can never predict how your query will unfold or who will respond.

 There's an undeniable charm to it: you can never predict how your query will unfold or who will respond

Oops! This image does not follow our content guidelines. To continue publishing, please remove it or upload a different image.
Broken CodeWhere stories live. Discover now