On the Evolution of Logic: An Introduction to Cognietrics

Trait Combinations

Inductive Reasoning is subjective, or Introverted, and so hard to share because the process of causation is concerned rather than a probabilistic class, leading to a variation of infinitism as used in the Münchhausen Trilemma (the regressive argument, in which each proof requires a further proof ad infinitum), as well as the degree of Inductive relevance, and the disagreement of proximate causes in the service of an ultimate cause. Deduction based on probabilities likewise concerns subjective elements and is hard to share. The probabilities of Inductive classes can be easily shared with a chart, and Deductive Reasoning likewise can be shown to be a set of syllogisms.

Classicists take probability Seriously and determinism Curiously. Progressives take determinism Seriously and probability Curiously. Reformers assist Concepts deterministically and Patterns statistically. Administrators check Concepts statistically and Patterns deterministically.

Considering that Inventors use synthetic clauses and Discoverers use analytic clauses:

Probabilistic Analysis, including average and standard deviation for a distribution, represents details calculated for Association, and so does Deterministic Synthesis. Direct Observation of the "Big Picture" occurs as a result of either Deterministic Analysis or Probabilistic Synthesis.

Deduction is synthetic iNtuition and analytic Sensation. Induction is analytic iNtuition and synthetic Sensation. Thinking is analytic Knowledge and synthetic Understanding. Feeling is synthetic Knowledge and analytic Understanding. Scholars use synthetic universals and analytic conditionality. Visionaries use analytic universals and synthetic conditionality.

As foundationalism is based on a form of Knowledge and coherentism is based on a form of Understanding:

Foundations are ideas that are Conceptually iNtuitive, however the scope of any associated Patterns must be found in Practice and cannot be guessed. Coherence allows Patterns to be iNtuited by relevant associations though the Concepts in use must be Practical in order to have a working model.

Universal foundations must be Associated due to their unique definitions, but when consistent foundations are Observed it is always in an incomplete Contextual manner due to Godel's Theorem, however when universals are Observed or Contextual information is Associated the goal is coherence.

Coherence proceeds from Deduction to Induction. Foundations proceed from Induction to Deduction. Invention proceeds from Patterns to Concepts. Discovery proceeds from Concepts to Patterns. Reform proceeds from Observation to Association. Administration proceeds from Association to Observation. Thoughts turn Dreams into Reality. Feelings bring Dreams about Reality. This is different from Induction and Deduction, which occur between Functions in the mind and not groups of people.

Discoverers have foundational logic and emotional coherence. Inventors have foundational emotions and logical coherence.

Scholars deal in deterministic foundations and probabilistic coherence. Visionaries deal in probabilistic foundations and deterministic coherence.

Reformers are quicker to make decisions based on coherence than on foundations. Administrators are quicker to make decisions based on foundations than on coherence.

Because imagination is built on prospective memories iNtuited individually, and practicality on retrospective memory Sensed as a whole, as Judgment negates memory to deal with change in Thought, or lack thereof in Feeling:

This is why when you like someone you have a good Feeling that doesn't change and Thoughts that do as you learn about the object of your affections. If you are suddenly disappointed it is possible that you will Think something negative that doesn't change while your previous Feelings do.

Understanding makes the unchanging change while Knowledge makes the changing stop. This is why Knowledge, which once justified has an unchanging form, is easier to transfer and store than Understanding.

Similarly, Induction takes ideas from the retrospective memory and applies them to the prospective memory, for example, to come up with an example, whereas Deduction takes ideas from the prospective memory and applies them to the retrospective memory, for example, to catch a lie.

Retrospective Induction and prospective Deduction are useful for Invention. Retrospective Deduction and prospective Induction are useful for Discovery.

Unchanging Knowledge and changing Understanding are useful for Invention. Unchanging Understanding and changing Knowledge are useful for Discovery.

Patterns give retrospective Knowledge and prospective Understanding. Concepts give retrospective Understanding and prospective Knowledge.

Classicists use unchanging retrospection and changing prospection. Progressives use unchanging prospection and changing retrospection.

Scholars use unchanging Associations and changing Observations. Visionaries use unchanging Observations and changing Associations.

Serious Types use prospective Axioms and retrospective Contexts. Curious Types use retrospective Axioms and prospective Contexts.

Probabilistic Types use unchanging Contexts and changing Axioms. Deterministic Types use unchanging Axioms and changing Contexts.

Introverted changing, or transformation, and Extraverted unchanging, or stagnation, are concerned with Reform. Extraverted changing, or chaos, and Introverted unchanging, or principle, are concerned with Administration. Introverted prospection, or planning, and Extraverted retrospection, or necessity, are concerned with the "Big Picture". Introverted retrospection, or experience, and Extraverted prospection, or reminding, are concerned with details. Probabilistic Types are spurred to action by prospective memory, or promise, rather than retrospective memory, or hopelessness. Deterministic Types are spurred to action by retrospective memory, or accountability, rather than prospective memory, or inevitability. Curious Types are spurred to action by unchanging, or boredom, rather than changing, or interest. Serious Types are spurred to action by changing, or urgency, rather than unchanging, or peace.

Induction fits changing Concepts to an unchanging Pattern. Deduction fits unchanging Concepts to a changing Pattern. Every combination of letters represents a Trait which can be logically combined with two others. Ideas such as Concepts, Induction, and even Change evolved together philosophically in groups of convenience, such that the meaning of any one simultaneously came to depend on the meaning of the others. Change itself is Deduced from a Pattern or Inducted Conceptually – red that is slightly purple in hue may seem red, but is actually near the ultraviolet spectrum because red cones are sensitive to violet light. The color has Changed if you Deduce the difference from a Pattern (by visual comparison) or Induct it Conceptually (by wavelength increments), whereas something more stable can be ultimately Deduced Conceptually (process of elimination) or Inducted as a Pattern (representative example).