Dawn crept over Seattle like a hesitant algorithm, testing variables one by one: first the faintest purple at the horizon, then streaks of orange piercing through the cloud cover, finally the full spectrum of morning painting the city's glass towers. Sarah hadn't moved from her workstation, her screens now displaying two parallel timelines – the original prediction where Marcus Walsh died, and the new probability matrix showing his altered fate.
89.2% had become 12.4%. A life saved with thirty-seven lines of code.
But it wasn't just the probability that had kept her attention fixed on Marcus Walsh when her screens had filled with potential tragedies. Sarah pulled up his latest article in The Atlantic: "The Hidden Cost of Predictive Analytics: When Algorithms Play God."
Her eyes scanned the key passages:
"In our rush to predict the future, we've forgotten to question who gets to shape it. Every prediction becomes a prescription. Every algorithm becomes a prophecy. But who watches the watchmen? Who guards us against the guardians of our digital destiny?"
A wry smile touched her lips. If he only knew.
The article continued, diving deep into the ethical implications of predictive technologies. It wasn't the usual privacy advocate fearmongering. Walsh understood the technology, respected its potential, but asked the questions Sarah had wrestled with since childhood: Just because we can predict something, should we intervene? Where does probability end and free will begin?
Her secondary monitor pinged – another prediction:
ANNA MARTINEZ
Medication interaction probability: 92.3%
Location: Swedish Medical Center
Time window: 10:30 AM - 11:00 AM
Sarah's fingers hovered over her keyboard, but she pulled back. Anna Martinez was a nurse, her medical records showing she worked in the same hospital where she would potentially receive the wrong medication. A simple clerical error. One life. But changing hospital records was different from triggering a home alarm system. Medical systems were more heavily monitored, the ripple effects more unpredictable.
She pulled up Marcus's profile again, this time diving deeper into his digital footprint. His recent research focused on PredictCore specifically – freedom of information requests, interviews with former employees, deep dives into their patents. He was getting close to something. Too close.
A new window popped up on her left monitor:
subunit
SYSTEM ALERT
Unauthorized access detected
Terminal: 33-F-2187
Time: 05:42 AM
User: Chen, Sarah
Access level: Override required
Her heart stuttered. PredictCore's security systems were finally noticing her late-night activities. She quickly initiated her cleanup protocols, erasing traces of her unauthorized predictions. But she kept Marcus's file open. There was something here, something important.
His social media feed showed a pattern: regular coffee shop visits, daily commute times, frequent attendance at tech ethics panels. But more importantly, his research was following the same path she had taken years ago. He was looking for patterns in tragedy, trying to understand if technology could prevent disaster rather than just profit from predicting it.
Sarah opened his most recent draft, stored in his cloud drive. The title made her blood freeze:
"PREDICTCORE'S SHADOW ALGORITHM: The Truth Behind Prevented Tragedies"
YOU ARE READING
The Algorithm of Us
Science FictionIn a rain-slicked Seattle high-rise, Sarah Chen spent her days staring at screens filled with scrolling data. As the lead architect for PredictCore, a social media analytics firm, she had developed algorithms to forecast consumer behavior. But late...
