Down with cuban revisionism

5 - Development of Cuban social-fascism: since the early 90's until nowadays

Castroists are doing their utmost to conquer the sympathy of imperialist China, as theyperceived that it is a mere question of time before it becomes the world absolutedominant imperialist superpower. In recent times, many representatives of Chineserevisionist-imperialist dictatorship have visited Cuba. According to Irish revisionistjournalist Toni Solo, on 30th May, 2013, colonel Guo Jinlong, General-Secretary of the"Communist" Party of China, visited the island allegedly in order to "fortify relationsbetween both countries and their respective ruling parties" (retired from:http://tortillaconsal.com/tortilla/es/node/12982, translated from Portuguese language),that is, to reinforce even more the absolute and exclusive domination of Chineseimperialism over social-fascist revisionist Cuba. In 2004, Chinese social-fascist Hu Jintao visited Cuba and was received by Castro. Jintao shamelessly praised "theachievements of Cuban government, party and people in socialist construction" andeven dared to state that "both the CPC and the CPC remain faithful to socialist andcommunist orientation in accord with their respective nations' conditions". In return,Castroist official newspaper "Granma Internacional" goes lower and lower bypublishing an article saying such falsities as that "Chinese experience shows that thereare alternatives", that "China's staggering economic development was accomplishedwithout capitalism, through a banking system under state control, a strong leadershipand an harmonious social development"! Castro also disgustingly stated that "Hu is agenuine communist". With these kind of affirmations, Jintao and Castro want to deceiveworld proletariat and world workers by hiding the anti-communist and bourgeoiscapitalist character of both Cuban revisionist social-fascism and of Chinese imperialism,thus facilitating the depicting and presentation of this last one as a "progressive" andeven "socialist and communist" force whose purpose is to "liberate world peoples' fromthe yoke of US imperialism". It is a deep insult to call fascist Jintao a "genuinecommunist", when the truth is that he is the representative of the most reactionary, antisocialist, pro-capitalist and pro-imperialist clique in the world: the bourgeois-capitalistbourgeois state-monopolist clique ruling China which transformed it into an almightyand unrivaled imperialist superpower. Chinese bourgeois, social-imperialist, capitalist,oppressive, repressive, neo-colonialist, wage slavagist, exploitative and anti-communistrulers could not be worse enemies of the world proletariat and of world socialistrevolution. Cuban revisionists' "friendship" with Chinese imperialists also shows howCastroist bourgeoisie does not hesitate in changing opinions in accord with their classinterests. During the decades of subservience towards Soviet revisionists, Castroistsused to criticize China in order to please their Soviet bosses, whose leadership of worldsocial-fascist and social-imperialist movement was being menaced by Chineserevisionists. But nowadays, as Soviet empire has vanished and Castroists need anothersuperpower to protect them and to keep their neo-colonial economy alive, they don'tthink twice before putting Cuba under another social-imperialist sway – that of Chineseimperialists. This is also very interesting because Castroist bourgeoisie often accusespro-American Cuban bourgeoisie exiled in Miami of being "pro-imperialist". But thetruth is that there are no substantial differences between them: while the last one servesAmerican imperialism, the first one served Soviet imperialism and now serves Chineseimperialism. Castroists often try to depict Chinese social-imperialist dominion overCuba as being "progressive" because Chinese social-fascists and social-imperialistsoccasionally contribute to the construction of schools, to the formation of technicalpersonnel and invite the sons and daughters of Castroist bourgeoisie to go study onChina. But far from denying Chinese revisionism's imperialist character, this onlyproves it. Following the example of Soviet social-imperialists, also Chinese imperialistsmay encourage the formation of foreign loyal cadres and servants (which can help themtaking maximum profits from neo-colonies) and provide certain countries with somecredits for the construction of a few infrastructures. But there is nothing "progressive"and much less "socialist" about this. On the contrary, this constitutes a mean ofincentive the development of commercial relations with those nations and of directinvestment in order to open the path towards complete neo-colonialist dominion overthem. Long time ago, comrade Lenin had already noted that the exportation of capitalsis a mean to encourage the exportation of commodities and merchandises. Nowadays,the exportation of Chinese imperialist capitals mainly aims at promoting commercialrelations with China as a prologue to imperialist absolute and exclusive rule by Chinesesocial-fascist, revisionist, state monopolist capitalist imperialist bourgeoisie with the aim of expanding its bourgeois-capitalist, neo-colonialist, social-imperialist, socialfascist, wage slavagist, exploitative, oppressive and anti-communist sphere of influence(a situation which is already in effect at this moment).