THE BOOK OF POOK

helps me, that is why it appears in the 'tips' section. If I wanted to discuss it, it

would go in the discussion section. (Many people do not understand this distinction

and start ranting on my threads and don't understand why I don't respond. There's

no need to discuss anything. The posts end up becoming so long because I already

put in the questions within the post.)

There is a trend lately where people do not see the posts, they just see 'Pook'. So

when a Pook post appears, they go 'pook baiting' (term coined by Ice-pick). A good

example of this is the 'Habit is All' thread. A very simple message (that provided

clarity in my life) but obsfuscated by nonsensical replies.

My mission is to try to correct the Pook. I actually don't care about anything else.

Things that help me I put out on the table, since maybe some of you guys have the

same problems I did. If the post sounds like Latin to you, then don't consider it.

We're all here to fix ourselves. Because the focus is on ourselves.

I think that was when my Big Change came was when I realized that I was the

problem, not the women. That's why I rage against the 'focus on women/controlling

women/tactics' posts (or rather, when they rage at me). The solution to your

problems is not in the woman but in yourself, but it does take a type of humility to

realize that YOU are the problem (consider the Nice Guy: HE is right and the

WORLD/WOMEN are wrong. He is backwards. He is wrong and the WOMEN are

right).

I've been here for 3-4 years. Looking at my past posts, I can see how A leads into

B and then to C and so on. For example, the Kill That Desperation post (for me)

slammed the door shut on 'tricks' and 'tactics'. So what else was there to do? After

that came "Be A Man" which seperated sexuality from intercourse. This slammed

the door on me on all the 'lay reports' and all. We are in a habit nowadays of

defining sexuality only to matters of sex when, in fact, it goes well beyond

intercourse.

Thus, a male and a man are not one but two. Anyone can be androgenous. And

being an androgenous is not a virtue, and being masculine is not a vice.

Now, who is it that is saying 'man' and 'woman' do not exist, in their sexualized

forms? Yes, gender theorists!

Gender theorists hold that masculinity and feminity are socially imposed, in other

words, artificial. I didn't realize they were the source but I did realize then that

something was off sexuality wise in our world (the Nice Guys seem, not born, but

manufactured). So I said, "Be a Man!" I want to free sexuality from 'just

intercourse' else the world beocmes androgenous and very dull.