^^ that's something all chaotic countries would do.
Well i did this... Thing.. i didn't add more cause i was running out of space but I'll make another with other countries... Soon.
Oops! This image does not follow our content guidelines. To continue publishing, please remove it or upload a different image.
Alright, Let's get explaining.
UN— He just wants to have world peace. He's a good boi. He just fails miserably at the job he was given.
EU— Neutral Good cause he's absolutely not like UN. But he still wants to help. But his decisions are a little questionable.
America— Also Neutral good. He wants to help others buuuuut he also makes questionable decisions that put him in here.
Japan— Chaotic Good. She's absolutely chaotic. She doesn't follow the law and doesn't care what people think about her. She's kind and will absolutely go out of her way to help a friend even if it means breaking a few laws.
Poland— Also Chaotic Good. But not as Chaotic Good as Japan. He doesn't care what people think about him. He can and will break laws to protect a friend. And he doesn't believe in laws that much.
Brazil— Chaotic Good. All of the above but with memes and him being fucking Tropical Russia.
In BRAZIL ROAD IS ROAD—
(Current)Britain— Lawful Neutral. He has a moral compass. He isn't interesting so let's skip.
(Current) France— Also Lawful Neutral. Also uninteresting. Napoleonic France would be Neutral Evil. Yes they are different persons. Kingdom Of France would probably thread between Neutral Evil and Lawful Neutral.
Russia— True Neutral. He does what seems like a good idea. Which isn't good as we all know. But he is more inclined to doing good than evil.
Germany— True Neutral. Also follows what seems like a good idea. Which turns out great for him.
Oh boi
Chaotic Neutral. AKA me.
Confederate States Of America— (yes he is in here shut the fuck up it's been a century.) Chaotic Neutral. He is an individualist first and last and he values his liberty. He doesn't strive to protect others' freedom alone. He doesn't intentionally disrupt anyone just for 'why not?' He would have to be motivated by either good or evil to actually do something. Unpredictable.
Empire of Brazil— Chaotic Neutral. Exactly the same with Confederacy but add in that he can go into Chaotic Evil depending on the circumstances.
Soviet Union— Lawful Evil. (What? You thought that Soviet good? Nahhhh he's just as bad as Third Reich.) Plays by the rules, But doesn't care about who he hurts. Has no mercy or compassion against the ones that oppose him. He craves power and would do anything to get it.
Third Reich... Oh boi. Threading between Lawful Evils and Neutral Evil. Same as the Soviet Union, But he doesn't play by the rules.
EMPIRE TIME WOO
British Empire— He does whatever he can get away with. He only cares about one thing and nothing else: Profit. He doesn't like killing, But if what's he's needs to do, He's gonna do it. Doesn't care about laws or far off future consequences. He's scared of Brazil Empire. Yes.
Portuguese Empire— Same as Britain, But racist. Actually cared about far off consequences. Shit his pants off because of Napoleonic France :) shoutout to France for helping us to get independence :D
Spanish Empire— Chaotic Evil. Worst of the worst. Didn't care about lives. He just did what he wanted to do and that Isn't good. Almost Disney Villain type.
